Limitations of artificial intelligence in distance education

  • Ileana Ordóñez Maldonado Centro de Estudios Tecnológicos Industrial y de Servicios No. 86

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has sparked growing debate about its actual effectiveness in supporting academic achievement. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of an AI model (ChatGPT) as a support tool for successfully completing a self-paced online course. The research followed a qualitative approach using a case study design, with the participation of a Mexican upper-secondary school teacher, who systematically documented her experience throughout the accreditation process. Data collection techniques included screenshots, chat transcripts, reflective journaling, and activity logs, all analyzed through thematic coding. Results showed that despite intensive support from the AI, the participant did not pass the “Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence” course, highlighting that the tool did not bridge existing conceptual gaps. The study concludes that the use of AI without intentional pedagogical mediation may foster operational learning, but does not ensure deep understanding. The value of this research lies in empirically documenting the limitations of AI in distance assessment contexts, a topic of growing global and educational relevance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2016). E-learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637541

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22, e24665. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.24665

García-Sanz-Calcedo, J., & González-Gaya, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: Contributions and ethical implications. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4563–4581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-w

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Liu, R., Wang, L., & Yu, Y. (2022). AI-supported learning environments and learners’ critical thinking: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 182, 104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

Ng, W., Leung, C., & Chu, S. (2020). Fostering computational thinking and problem-solving skills in STEM education: A systematic review. Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09813-4

OpenAI. (2024). GPT-4 technical report (Version 4). https://openai.com/research/gpt-4

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Selwyn, N. (2023). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of schooling. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2158110

Worthington, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and epistemic responsibility in education. AI & Society, 37, 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01230-1

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.
Published
2026-02-18
How to Cite
Ordóñez Maldonado, I. (2026). Limitations of artificial intelligence in distance education. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 16(32), e1046. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v16i32.2843
Section
Scientific articles