Evaluative judgment that Chilean teachers make about the difficulty of the PISA mathematics items and students’ achievement

  • Verónica Villarroel Henríquez Universidad San Sebastián
  • María Angélica San Martín Toro Universidad del Desarrollo
  • Carmen Núñez Ramos Universidad del Desarrollo
  • Carolina Hernández Opazo Universidad del Desarrollo
  • Isidora Castillo Rabanal University College London
  • Alejandro Sánchez Oñate Universidad del Desarrollo

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the evaluative judgment of mathematics teachers regarding the difficulty of a sample of items on which students exhibited high and low performance in the PISA 2015 test in Chile. Through a quantitative research approach and an exploratory design, non-probabilistic and intentional sampling, 18 mathematics teachers participated responding to a survey with open and closed-ended questions, evaluating each item in relation to five dimensions (item formulation, content, contextualization, skill, and complexity). It was found that 40% of mathematics teachers have difficulty accurately pinpointing items where students demonstrated low performance. However, they tended to agree in 60% of the assessments and predict students' performance in high-performance items by 80%. According to teachers, students will face more challenges in items measuring higher cognitive abilities, with low familiarity with the item type, and when information is implicitly presented in the problem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-06-03
How to Cite
Villarroel Henríquez, V., San Martín Toro, M. A., Núñez Ramos, C., Hernández Opazo, C., Castillo Rabanal, I., & Sánchez Oñate, A. (2024). Evaluative judgment that Chilean teachers make about the difficulty of the PISA mathematics items and students’ achievement. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 14(28). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v14i28.1932
Section
Scientific articles