Generic competence on teaching staff of higher education in the State of Guerrero
Abstract
Goal: To identify the teaching staff generic competence, that orients the educational practice on higher education on the state of Guerrero, taking into account the students opinion. Method: Descriptive and longitudinal studies on the period 2012-2014; it was applied a questionnaire to students of seven institutions. The sample was: 37 % teaching staff and 41 % students per institution, assessing each academic member 10 students. The information was adapted to the Likert scale, posteriorly to the numeric scale of Sampieri to obtain quartiles thus classifying the data on high medium and low competence. The strength and weakness on the indicators were calculated using the arithmetic mean and classifying it using the median. Results: on a state level 56 % of the teaching staff is of high competence, 44 % between medium and low competence. By sub-dimensions: normal staff 71 %, university staff 64% and technological staff 44 % showed high competence on values and evaluation; on pedagogical showed notorious deficiencies. On Indicators: 9 % normalist staff has high strengths; 58 % of university staff medium competences and technological staff 100 % showed medium competences.
Downloads
References
Calderón, N. (2010). Diseño de un cuestionario de evaluación de la competencia docente con base en la opinión de los alumnos. Tesis de maestría en ciencias educativas. Ensenada, B. C., México.
Cano, M. E (2005). Cómo mejorar las competencias de los docentes. Barcelona, Graó, p. 3. Disponible en: http://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev123COL1.pdf
Cano, M. E. (2008). “La evaluación por competencias en la educación superior”. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado. España, 12 (3), p. 1-16, Disponible en: http://www.ub.edu/cubac/sites/default/files/la_evaluacion_por_competencias_en_la_educacion_superior_0.pdf
Cruz, R. (2012, 16 de abril). Modelo por competencias en el campo de la educación. Monografías. Disponible en: http://www.monografias.com/trabajos92/modelo-competencias/modelo-competencias.shtml
Casanova, M. A. (1992). La evaluación, garantía de la calidad para el centro educativo. España, Editorial Luis Vives.
Darling, L. (2002). “El derecho de aprender. Crear buenas escuelas para todos”. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado. Barcelona, 43, pp.158-170. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/274/27404314.pdf
Denyer, M., Furnémont, J., Poulain R., y Vanloubbeeck G. (2007). Las competencias en la educación, un balance. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 17-44.
González, P.M. (1997). Evaluación del aprendizaje en la enseñanza universitaria. CEPES UHY. La Habana, Cuba.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., y Baptista L. P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. México, Editorial McGraw Hill, p. 373.
Moreno, T. (2009). Competencias en educación superior: Un alto en el camino para revisar la ruta de viaje. Perfiles Educativos, 31 (124), 69-92.
Zabalza, M. A. (2003). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Calidad y desarrollo profesional. Madrid, Narcea.
Zabalza, M. A. (2007). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario: calidad y desarrollo profesional. Madrid, Narcea, p. 70.
Rueda, M. (2009). La evaluación del desempeño docente: consideraciones desde el enfoque por competencias. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 11 (2). Disponible en: http://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/234/751#2
Rueda, M. (2010). El enfoque por competencias: ¿salida a la crisis educativa? Perfiles Educativos | vol. XXXII, núm. 127, 2010 | IISUE-UNAM | Editorial. En http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/peredu/v32n127/v32n127a1.pdf
Zabala, A. y Arnau, L. (2007). "La enseñanza de las competencias". Aula de Innovación Educativa, España, No. 161, pp. 40-46. Disponible en: http://upvv.clavijero.edu.mx/cursos/ObservacionPracticaIII/vector2/tarea6/documentos/Zabala_Arnua.pdf
In order to promote the development and dissemination of research in education in Latin America, the Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development (RIDE) adhered to the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which is why it is identified as a Open access publication. This means that any user can read the complete text of the articles, print them, download them, copy them, link them, distribute them and use the contents for other purposes. Creative Cummons licenses allow users to specify the rights to use an open access journal available on the Internet in such a way that users know the rules of publication. Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: Authors they keep the author's rights and give the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published material whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that The work was published for the first time in this magazine. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work. low on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of the published work
