Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. 2009-2018 Bibliometric Analysis: Scopus Database
Abstract
The objective of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of academic production in the field of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in the Scopus database. The above with the purpose of identifying in this subject the indicators by year, author, affiliation, country or territory, type of document and knowledge area. The methodology of bibliometric analysis described by Escorcia (2008) and Arias (November 28, 2014) was applied, which consists in performing statistical techniques that have the purpose of evaluating the research process and its evolution. The study was of a quantitative longitudinal nature with a description of trends in scientific production. As part of the main results, it was identified that 2015 was the year that had the highest production record on the subject, with a total of 80 documents published in the database, considering that Scopus has records since 1985. While the author who had more publications on the term ADR was Cheung So, researcher at the University of Hong Kong, with a total of 19 documents. Likewise, it was found that the country that had the most publications in said database was the United States of America with 369 documents between 1985 and 2018. Although Scopus has a record since 1985, the period of analysis corresponded to the decade from 2009 to 2018. Although there was an increase in the publications on the ADR mechanisms, it should be noted that a significant decrease was identified in the publication of documents alluding to the subject as of 2015.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2020 RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Docente
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In order to promote the development and dissemination of research in education in Latin America, the Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development (RIDE) adhered to the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which is why it is identified as a Open access publication. This means that any user can read the complete text of the articles, print them, download them, copy them, link them, distribute them and use the contents for other purposes. Creative Cummons licenses allow users to specify the rights to use an open access journal available on the Internet in such a way that users know the rules of publication. Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: Authors they keep the author's rights and give the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published material whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that The work was published for the first time in this magazine. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work. low on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of the published work
