Re-learning teaching performance and evaluation of academic work
Abstract
This work analyzes the participation of academics of the University of Sonora during a decade in the Stimulus Program for Teaching Performance, which form part of the evaluation policies that seek the change and the institutional transformation, besides facing the necessity of differentiate the academic work in accordance with it teaching productivity and performance. In addition, discussed the problems faced by the evaluation processes aimed at academics, linked to the allocation of additional financial resources. Empirically, a process of re-learning is identified in view of adjustments and control that universities have on the evaluation underpinning this programme. It is also notable that although universities are compliant with the capacity to control they have, there is a need and the timing of moving towards a differently way of academic work regulation, in order to improve the quality of the teaching communities.
Downloads
References
Berman, Paul (1993). El estudio de la macro y micro implementación. En Aguilar, L. La implementación de las políticas, México: Porrúa, pp. 281-321.
Brunner, José Joaquín (2005). Transformaciones de la Universidad Pública. Revista de Sociología, Universidad de Chile, 19, 31-49. Recuperado de http://www.facso.uchile.cl/publicaciones/sociologia/articulos/19/1902-Brunner.pdf
Cerych, Ladislav y Sabatier, Paul (1986). Great expectations and mixed performances The implementation of the higher education reforms in europe. Stok-On-Trent: Trentham Books.
Comas-Rodríguez, Oscar y Rivera, Alicia (2011). La docencia universitaria frente a los estímulos económicos. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 32, 41-54. http://www.fpce.up.pt/ciie/revistaesc/ESC32/Artigos_32_Comas-RodRiguez.pdf
Cordero, Graciela y Backhoff, Eduardo (2002). Problemas metodológicos del desempeño académico asociado a los programas de estímulos. Revista de la Educación Superior, 1(123), 5-20. Recuperado de http://publicaciones.anuies.mx/pdfs/revista/Revista123_S1A1ES.pdf
Díaz Barriga, Ángel (1996). Los programas de evaluación (estímulos al rendimiento académico) en la comunidad de investigadores. Un estudio en la UNAM. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 1 (2), 408-423. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/140/14000209.pdf
Díaz Barriga, Ángel (2006). Evaluación de la educación superior. Entre la compulsividad y el conformismo. En Todd, L. y Arredondo, V. La educación que México necesita. Visión de expertos. México: Centro de Altos Estudios e Investigación Pedagógica, pp. 43-58.
Gil Antón, Manuel (2002). Amor de Ciudad Grande: una visión general del espacio para el trabajo académico en México. Sociológica, 17(49), 93-130. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3050/305026562005.pdf
Heras, Leticia (2005). La política de educación superior en México: Los programas de estímulos a profesores e investigadores. Educere, 9(29), pp. 207-215. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/356/35602909.pdf
Ibarra Colado, Eduardo (2009). Impacto de la evaluación en la educación superior mexicana: Valoración y debates. Revista de la Educación Superior, 38 (149), 173-182. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/resu/v38n149/v38n149a9.pdf
Ibarra Colado, Eduardo y Porter, Luis (2007). Costos de la evaluación en escenarios de continuidad: Lecciones mexicanas sobre las disputas con los mercaderes del templo del saber. Espacio Abierto, 16(1), 61-88. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/122/12216103.pdf
Ibarra Colado, Eduardo y Rondero, Norma (2008). Regulación del trabajo académico y deshomologación salarial: balance general de sus ejes problemáticos. En Bertussi, T. y González, G. (Coord.), Anuario Educativo Mexicano: visión retrospectiva, año 2005, México: UPN/Miguel Ángel Porrúa, pp. 569-603.
Patrón, Roger y Cisneros, Edith (2014). Los sistemas de estímulos académicos y la evaluación de la docencia: experiencia de dos universidades. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 7(2), 85-95.
Rondero, Norma (2007). Impacto de las becas y estímulos en la producción del trabajo académico: el caso de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Revista Sociológica, 22 (65), 103-128. Recuperado de http://www.revistasociologica.com.mx/pdf/6505.pdf
Silva, César (2007). Evaluación y burocracia: medir igual a los diferentes. Revista de la Educación Superior, 36 (143), 7-24. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/resu/v36n143/v36n143a1.pdf
In order to promote the development and dissemination of research in education in Latin America, the Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development (RIDE) adhered to the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which is why it is identified as a Open access publication. This means that any user can read the complete text of the articles, print them, download them, copy them, link them, distribute them and use the contents for other purposes. Creative Cummons licenses allow users to specify the rights to use an open access journal available on the Internet in such a way that users know the rules of publication. Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: Authors they keep the author's rights and give the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published material whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that The work was published for the first time in this magazine. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work. low on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of the published work
